Transformation of Analytical Capacity in Health Policy Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Canadian Administrative Practice and Lessons for Developing Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v3i2.253Keywords:
Analytical Capacity, Policy Capacity, Health Data, GovernanceAbstract
The transformation of analytical capacity has become central to health policy governance because governments must convert increasingly complex data, scientific evidence, and stakeholder knowledge into timely and defensible decisions. This article examines how analytical capacity is developed in Canadian health governance and identifies conditions under which selected practices may be adapted in developing-country settings. A structured qualitative literature review and comparative lesson-drawing design was applied to 40 scholarly sources published between 2016 and 2026. The analysis integrates policy-capacity theory with evidence-informed policymaking and learning-health-system perspectives. Analytical capacity is operationalized through four interdependent dimensions: technical and data capability, institutional arrangements, human-resource capability, and organizational culture. The findings show that Canada’s experience is characterized by a dense evidence infrastructure, specialized analytical organizations, knowledge-translation platforms, investment in professional expertise, and growing efforts to improve data stewardship and interoperability. However, Canadian practice also demonstrates important constraints arising from federal fragmentation, uneven data access, interjurisdictional coordination costs, and the gap between the availability of evidence and its actual use in policy decisions. The comparative analysis therefore rejects mechanical policy transfer. Transferable lessons are conditional on institutional readiness, data governance, workforce capability, leadership commitment, and mechanisms that connect evidence production to formal decision routines.
Downloads
References
Béland, D., Marchildon, G. P., Medrano, A., & Rocco, P. (2021). COVID-19, federalism, and health care financing in Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2020.1848353
Cairney, P. (2016). The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51781-4
Cairney, P., & Oliver, K. (2017). Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy? Health Research Policy and Systems, 15, Article 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x
Cairney, P., Oliver, K., & Wellstead, A. (2016). To bridge the divide between evidence and policy: Reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 399–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12555
Capano, G., & Lepori, B. (2024). Designing policies that could work: Understanding the interaction between policy design spaces and organizational responses in public sector. Policy Sciences, 57(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-024-09521-0
Cassidy, C., Sim, M., Somerville, M., Crowther, D., Sinclair, D., Elliott Rose, A., Burgess, S., Best, S., & Curran, J. A. (2022). Using a learning health system framework to examine COVID-19 pandemic planning and response at a Canadian Health Centre. PLOS ONE, 17(9), Article e0273149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273149
Craft, J., & Wilder, M. (2017). Catching a second wave: Context and compatibility in advisory system dynamics. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12133
Denis, J.-L., Usher, S., & Préval, J. (2022). Health reforms and policy capacity: The Canadian experience. Policy and Society, 42(1), 64–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac010
Desson, Z., Weller, E., McMeekin, P., & Ammi, M. (2020). An analysis of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Belgium, and Canada. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.09.002
Dubois, A., & Lévesque, M. (2020). Canada’s National Collaborating Centres: Facilitating evidence-informed decision-making in public health. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 46(2/3), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v46i23a02
El Sabawy, D., Feldman, J., & Pinto, A. D. (2024). The Connected Care for Canadians Act: An important step toward interoperability of health data. CMAJ, 196(42), E1385–E1388. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.241123
Enticott, J., Johnson, A., & Teede, H. (2021). Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 21, Article 200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06215-8
Friedman, C. P. (2022). What is unique about learning health systems? Learning Health Systems, 6, Article e10328. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10328
Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more ‘evidence-informed’ policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12475
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: Critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12091
Husson, H., Howarth, C., Neil-Sztramko, S., & Dobbins, M. (2021). The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT): Supporting evidence-informed decision-making in public health in Canada. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 47(5/6), 292–296. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v47i56a08
Imani, R. A. G., Sari, N. P., & Wulandari, S. P. (2024). SWOT analysis of Indonesian public health policy using PCA method. Journal Governance Society, 1(2), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v1i2.72
Kuchenmüller, T., Boeira, L., Oliver, S., Moat, K., El-Jardali, F., Barreto, J., & Lavis, J. N. (2022). Domains and processes for institutionalizing evidence-informed health policy-making: A critical interpretive synthesis. Health Research Policy and Systems, 20, Article 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-022-00820-7
Lawrence, L. M., Fierlbeck, K., McGrath, P. J., & Curran, J. A. (2020). An expert-generated tool for assessing policy capacity. Canadian Public Administration, 63(2), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12364
Marchildon, G. P., Allin, S., & Merkur, S. (2020). Canada: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 22(3), 1–194.
McGrail, K., & Buckeridge, D. L. (2026). Timely availability and accessibility of health data: Meeting the challenge of Pan-Canadian Health Data Charter Principle 6. Healthcare Management Forum, 39(5), 448–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704261455456
McGrail, K., & Kelly, M. (2025). Standardizing health data stewardship principles and practices in Canada. International Journal of Population Data Science, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v10i4.3198
Migone, A., & Howlett, M. (2023). Assessing policy analytical capacity in contemporary governments: New measures and metrics. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 82(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12564
Mukherjee, I., Coban, M. K., & Bali, A. S. (2021). Policy capacities and effective policy design: A review. Policy Sciences, 54(2), 243–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-021-09420-8
Nash, D. M., Bhimani, Z., Rayner, J., & Zwarenstein, M. (2021). Learning health systems in primary care: A systematic scoping review. BMC Family Practice, 22, Article 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-021-01483-z
Newman, J., Patmisari, E., & Widianingsih, I. (2022). Policy analytical capacity and ‘Eastern’ styles of policy analysis: Evidence from West Java Province, Indonesia. Policy Sciences, 55, 469–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09470-6
Oliver, K., & Cairney, P. (2019). The dos and don’ts of influencing policy: A systematic review of advice to academics. Palgrave Communications, 5, Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0232-y
Oliver, K., Hopkins, A., Boaz, A., Guillot-Wright, S., & Cairney, P. (2022). What works to promote research-policy engagement? Evidence & Policy, 18(4), 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16420918447616
Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge.
Parkhurst, J., Ettelt, S., & Hawkins, B. (Eds.). (2018). Evidence use in health policy making: An international public policy perspective. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93467-9
Partridge, A. C. R., Mansilla, C., Randhawa, H., Lavis, J. N., El-Jardali, F., & Sewankambo, N. K. (2020). Lessons learned from descriptions and evaluations of knowledge translation platforms supporting evidence-informed policy-making in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18, Article 127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00626-5
Pomare, C., Mahmoud, Z., Vedovi, A., Ellis, L. A., Knaggs, G., Smith, C. L., Zurynski, Y., & Braithwaite, J. (2022). Learning health systems: A review of key topic areas and bibliometric trends. Learning Health Systems, 6(1), Article e10265. https://doi.org/10.1002/lrh2.10265
Santosa, T. A., Manahor, A., & Bin Salamah, S. F. (2025). Revisiting governance theory: A comprehensive framework for 21st-century public administration. Journal Governance Society, 2(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v2i2.157
Sarkies, M. N., Bowles, K.-A., Skinner, E. H., Haas, R., Lane, H., & Haines, T. P. (2017). The effectiveness of research implementation strategies for promoting evidence-informed policy and management decisions in healthcare: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 12, Article 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0662-0
Shaw, J., & Sekalala, S. (2023). Health data justice: Building new norms for health data governance. npj Digital Medicine, 6, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00780-4
Srivastava, D., Van Kessel, R., Delgrange, M., Cherla, A., Sood, H., & Mossialos, E. (2023). A framework for digital health policy: Insights from virtual primary care systems across five nations. PLOS Digital Health, 2(11), Article e0000382. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000382
Walls, H., Liverani, M., Chheng, K., & Parkhurst, J. (2017). The many meanings of evidence: A comparative analysis of the forms and roles of evidence within three health policy processes in Cambodia. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15, Article 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0260-2
Witter, S., Anderson, I., Annear, P., Awosusi, A., Bhandari, N. N., Brikci, N., Binachon, B., Chanturidze, T., Gilbert, K., Jensen, C., Lievens, T., McPake, B., Raichowdhury, S., & Jones, A. (2019). What, why and how do health systems learn from one another? Insights from eight low- and middle-income country case studies. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0410-1
Wolfson, M. (2024). Indicators for assessing the interoperability of health data in Canada. CMAJ, 196(42), E1389–E1390. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.241351
Wu, X., Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (Eds.). (2018). Policy capacity and governance: Assessing governmental competences and capabilities in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yogi Anugrah Nurrochim, Alfahrizal Andrian, Ilham Muhammad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
