Political Governance of Recognition and Agrarian Conflict: A Case Study of the Lom Bangka Tribe in the Post-Extraction Era

Authors

  • Dwi Jati Marta Regional Secretariat of Bangka Regency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v2i3.194

Keywords:

Agrarian Conflict, Reconciliation, Recognition, Lom Tribe, Indigenous Peoples

Abstract

This article examines the politics of recognition in agrarian conflict affecting the Lom (Mapur) Indigenous community in Bangka Regency, Indonesia, in the context of post-extractive tin mining and oil palm expansion. It asks how the Lom community responds to its status as a legal subject after agrarian conflict and what opportunities and challenges recognition politics offers for resolving extractive disputes. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative case study combining document analysis, participatory observation, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions conducted in Air Abik and Pejam hamlets, analyzed using Miles et al.’s interactive model and Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition. The findings reveal a multidimensional crisis of recognition, in which vertical conflict with the state and corporations and horizontal fragmentation within the community jointly undermine the domains of love, rights, and solidarity. At the same time, grassroots initiatives especially the revitalization of customary councils and the “One Lom Tribe” discourse have begun to restore trust, rebuild collective identity, and articulate bottom-up aspirations for recognition. However, fragmented legal pathways, sectoral ego, and weak political commitment at the regional level continue to constrain substantive recognition. The study concludes that only an integrated recognition regime that strengthens customary institutions and harmonizes national and local regulations can secure the Lom’s customary territories and support sustainable socio-ecological governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariyadi, A., Hasan, A., & Muzainah, G. (2022). Kearifan Lokal dalam Pengelolaan Hutan di Kalimantan Tengah: Local Wisdom In Forest Management In Central Kalimantan. Anterior Jurnal, 21(3), 11–16. https://doi.org/10.33084/ANTERIOR.V21I3.3597

Cholillah, J. (2015). Orang Lom: Masalah Sosial dan Ancaman Kearifan Lokal dalam Tinjauan Sosiologi. Society, 3(2), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v3i2.49

Darmawan, B., Saputra, P. P., & Hidayat, N. (2024). Tergerusnya kearifan lokal orang Mapur di tengah ekspansi Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit PT. GPL di Dusun Air Abik, Kabupaten Bangka. Academy of Education Journal, 15(1), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.47200/AOEJ.V15I1.2142

Ferrer, A. F., & Retis, J. (2019). Ethnic minority media: Between hegemony and resistance. In Journal of Alternative and Community Media (Vol. 4, Issue 3). Intellect Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1386/JOACM_00054_1/CITE/REFWORKS

George, R. (2014). Teori Sosiologi : Dari Sosiologi Klasik sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern. Pustaka Pelajar. //library.stiami.ac.id/index.php?p=show_detail&id=12072&keywords=

Gunawan, A., & Azzahra, D. (2024). Realitas Pahit Masyarakat Adat Pasca 11 Tahun Putusan MK 35. Aliandi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara. https://aman.or.id/news/read/1814

Hariandja, R. (2024). RUU Masyarakat Adat: Akankah Selesai Periode Ini atau Mulai dari Nol Lagi? Mongabay. https://mongabay.co.id/2024/04/27/ruu-masyarakat-adat-akankah-selesai-periode-ini-atau-mulai-dari-nol-lagi/

Helmi, H., Pebrianto, D. Y., Hafrida, H., Kusniati, R., & Saputra, B. (2023). Local Wisdom in Indonesia: Assessing its Legal Status and Role in Forest Protection. Jambe Law Journal, 6(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.22437/JLJ.6.2.125-141

Juniarti, S. R., Yani, I. A., & Yani, A. (2016). Kearifan Lokal Masyarakat Dalam Menjaga Kelestarian Hutan Adat Tawang Panyai Di Desa Tapang Semadak Kecamatan Sekadau Hilir Kabupaten Sekadau. Jurnal Hutan Lestari, 4(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.26418/jhl.v4i3.16371

Kusomo, R. (2022). Kisah Suku Lom, Penjaga Kelestarian Alam Pulau Bangka yang Mulai Terancam. Good News from Indonesia. https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2022/06/08/kisah-suku-lom-penjaga-kelestarian-alam-pulau-bangka-yang-mulai-terancam

Megasari, D. F., & Sulastriyono, S. (2013). Pengakuan Pemerintah Kabupaten terhadap Masyarakat Hukum Adat Dayak Meratus dan Hak Atas Tanahnyadi Kecamatan Loksado Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Selatan Kalimantan Selatan [Universitas Gadjah Mada]. http://aunilo.uum.edu.my/Find/Record/id-ugm-repo.97492?ui=bs3&print=1

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. In Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed., Vol. 47, Issue Suppl 4). SAGE Publications. http://www.uk.sagepub.com/books/Book239534?siteId=sage-uk

Prasetio, T. B., Karim, A., Nurkidam, A., & Rasyid, A. (2024). Mappadendang: Analisis Fungsionalisme Struktural Pada Tradisi Suku Bugis. Pangadereng : Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 9(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.36869/PJHPISH.V9I1.336

Rachman, N. F., & Siscawati, M. (2014). Masyarakat Hukum Adat adalah penyandang hak, subjek hukum, dan pemilik wilayah adatnya : Memahami secara konstektual putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia atas perkara nomor 35/PU-X/2012. Insist Press. https://simpus.mkri.id/opac/detail-opac?id=10236

Santosa, T. A., Manahor, A., & Salamah, S. fatimah Bin. (2025). Revisiting Governance Theory: A Comprehensive Framework for 21st-Century Public Administration. Journal Governance Society , 2(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.69812/JGS.V2I2.157

Savitri, L. A. (2014). Rentang Batas dari Rekognisi Hutan Adat Dalam Kepengaturan Neoliberal. Wacana: Jurnal Transformasi Sosial, 33(XIV), 61–98. http://www.insist.or.id/

Shohibuddin, M., & Soetarto, E. (2010). Krisis Agraria Sebagai Akar Kemiskinan: Menuju Pandangan Relasional Mengenai Kemiskinan. academia.edu. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260243885_Krisis_Agraria_Sebagai_Akar_Kemiskinan_Menuju_Pandangan_Relasional_Mengenai_Kemiskinan

Suharno, S., & Utomo, W. (2011). Politik Rekognisi Dalam Peraturan Daerah Tentang Penyelesaian Konflik Di Dalam Masyarakat Multikultural (Studi Kasus terhadap Perumusan dan Implementasi Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur). Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Sulaiman, A. (2014). Strategi Bertahan (Survival Strategy): Studi Tentang ”Agama Adat” Orang Lom di Desa Pejem, Kecamatan Belinyu, Kabupaten Bangka, Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung. Society, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v2i1.45

Vico, N., Hakim, S., & Koh, H. X. (2024). Relevance of Presidential Neutrality to achieve of Good governance in Indonesia: A comparative study of Joko Widodo’s first and Second Regimes. Journal Governance Society , 1(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.69812/JGS.V1I1.38

Wijaya, T. (2022). Tergerusnya Hutan Adat Suku Melayu Tua di Pulau Bangka. Mongabay. https://mongabay.co.id/2022/03/05/tergerusnya-hutan-adat-suku-melayu-tua-di-pulau-bangka/

Wirazilmustaan, W., Robuwan, R., & Agustian, R. A. (2020). Urgensi Pembentukan Lembaga Adat Urang Lom Guna Memberikan Perlindungan Suku Lom. PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum, 14(2), 169–192. https://doi.org/10.33019/PROGRESIF.V15I2.1983

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications Design and Methods Sixth Edition. In Japan Marketing Journal (6th ed., Issue 2). SAGE Publication.

Zulkarnain, I., Soetarto, E., Sunito, S., & Adiwibowo, S. (2018a). Stifling of Customary People Political Voice of Recognition in Political Economy Perspective (Case Study on Mapur Tribe Lom Bangka Belitung). Sodality: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.22500/SODALITY.V6I3.24325

Zulkarnain, I., Soetarto, E., Sunito, S., & Adiwibowo, S. (2018b). Tin Mining and Political Territory of Lom Indigenous People in Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Maritime and Archipelago (ICoMA 2018), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.2991/ICOMA-18.2019.63

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Marta, D. J. (2025). Political Governance of Recognition and Agrarian Conflict: A Case Study of the Lom Bangka Tribe in the Post-Extraction Era. Journal Governance Society , 2(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v2i3.194