The Integration of Governance Theory in the Development of Equitable Legal Policies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v2i3.188Keywords:
Accountability, Governance, Legal Policy, ParticipationAbstract
This study addresses the limitations of state-centric legal systems in responding to increasingly complex social, political, and institutional challenges, which often result in legal policies that are formally valid but substantively unjust. It aims to explain how the systematic integration of governance principles can strengthen the legitimacy, fairness, and effectiveness of legal policymaking. Employing a normative juridical method, the research analyzes legislation, policy documents, jurisprudence, and scholarly works using statute, conceptual, and comparative approaches to examine how transparency, participation, accountability, and the rule of law are embedded in the formulation and implementation of legal policies. The findings show that when governance principles guide lawmaking, legal policy shifts from a unilateral exercise of state authority to a participatory and collaborative process involving multiple actors, thereby enhancing legal certainty, protecting public interests, and promoting social justice. The analysis also reveals that governance based mechanisms such as public consultation, judicial review, independent oversight bodies, and open-data regulations help reduce principal agent problems, curb corruption risks, and align legal outcomes with societal expectations. The study concludes that legal systems are better able to meet societal needs, maintain public trust, and support equitable development when governance principles are consistently institutionalized throughout the policy cycle, from agenda setting and drafting to implementation and evaluation, positioning governance theory as a foundational paradigm for designing responsive, accountable, and sustainable legal frameworks.
Downloads
References
Abou Ltaif, S., & Mihai-Yiannaki, S. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Political Patronage Networks on Financial Stability: Lebanon’s 2019 Economic Crisis. Economies, 12(7), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12070183
Akinbi, I. (2025). Transformative Governance for Peacebuilding: Bridging Institutional Accountability and Equitable Development in Post-Conflict Societies. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 6, 6470–6487. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.6.0525.1789
Al Amaren, E., Hamad, A., & Al Mashhour, O. (2020). An Introduction to the Legal Research Method: To Clear the Blurred Image on How Students Understand the Method of the Legal Science Research. International Journal of Law and Politics Studies, 1, 50–55.
Bernstein, S., Glas, A., & Laurence, M. (2025). Norms, Practices, and Social Change in Global Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009560986
Bhandari, M. (2023). The Corruption: A Chronic Disease of Humanity Causes, Effects and Consequences. ASEJ Scientific Journal of Bielsko-Biala School of Finance and Law, 27(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.19192/wsfip.sj1.2023.1
Bimantara, A., & Salman, R. (2025). The Constitutional Court’s Decision on the Perppu on Mass Organizations from the Perspective of Rechtsstaat and Critical Legal Studies. JUSTISI, 11(3), 927–948. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i3.4662
Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & ’t Hart, P. (2008). Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool. Public Administration, 86, 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.x
Buchan, R., Franchini, D., & Tsagourias, N. (2023). Effectiveness, Authority, and Legitimacy of the Current System of International Dispute Settlement and Possible Reforms. In R. Buchan, D. Franchini, & N. Tsagourias (Eds.), The Changing Character of International Dispute Settlement: Challenges and Prospects (pp. 135–364). Cambridge University Press.
Cairney, P., & Toomey, C. (2025). Systems Leadership: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Advice for Policymakers. Open Research Europe, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.18982.1
Cottier, T., Echandi, R., Liechti, R., Payosova, T., & Sieber-Gasser, C. (2017). The Principle of Proportionality in International Law: Foundations and Variations. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 18, 628–672. https://doi.org/10.1163/22119000-12340054
Fanani, A., & Zulkarnain, M. S. (2022). Understanding John Austin’s Legal Positivism Theory and Hans Kelsen’s Pure Legal Theory: An Introduction for Beginners. Sultan Omar ’Ali Saifuddien Centre for Islam Studies (SOASCIS) Journal, 1(2), 107–118.
Feng, R., Zhang, L., & Xu, H. (2025). Data-driven governance: Developing evaluation indices for China’s intelligent political and legal systems. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101207
Frosio, G., & Geiger, C. (2023). Taking Fundamental Rights Seriously in the Digital Services Act’s Platform Liability Regime. European Law Journal, 29, 31–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12475
Guzman, S. (2007). Rational Legal Authority. In The Encyclopedia of Social Theory (pp. 1–2). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosr026.pub2
Hakimi, M., Zarinkhail, S., Aslamzai, S., & Sahnosh, F. A. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Legal Reform in Developing Countries: Advancing Ethical, Rights-Based, and Accountable Digital Governance. Jurnal Ilmiah Telsinas Elektro Sipil Dan Teknik Informasi, 8, 127–144. https://doi.org/10.38043/telsinas.v8i2.6934
Hendrastuti, R., & Harahap, R. (2023). Agency Theory: Review of the Theory and Current Research. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 10, 85. https://doi.org/10.17977/um004v10i12023p085
Hendriks, C. (2012). The Politics of Public Deliberation: Citizen Engagement and Interest Advocacy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347564
Humah, D. (2025). Evaluation of the Legislative Process in the Revision of the TNI Law: Transparency, Public Participation, and Constitutionality. Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(6), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.61942/jhk.v2i6.452
Hutauruk, A. (2025). Law Under the Grip of Power. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 6(7), 2445–2453. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i7.1816
International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP). (2018). Political Regulation, Governance, and Societal Transformations. In International Panel on Social Progress (IPSP) (Ed.), Rethinking Society for the 21st Century: Report of the International Panel on Social Progress (pp. 371–596). Cambridge University Press.
Ip, E. (2011). Globalization and the Future of the Law of the Sovereign State. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8, 636–655. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq033
Iristian, Y. (2024). Ensuring Administrative Legality and Justice Through Judicial Review in Indonesia. Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research, 2, 214–234. https://doi.org/10.62504/jimr390
Isbandono, P., Utami, D. A., Prastyawan, A., Gamaputra, G., & Lestari, Y. (2025). Transparency and Accountability in Public Services and Policies in Administrative Law: A Comparative Study of Indonesia and Norway. Pena Justisia, 24(1), 3998–4016. https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6029
Jitmau, S., Naim, S., & Akhdharisa, M. (2025). Implementation of the Principle of Equality Before the Law in the Dynamics of Indonesian Law. JUSTISI, 11(2), 441–455. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.4088
Kamil, R. (2025). Legal positivism influence on law enforcement and judicial practice in Indonesia. JUSTISI, 11(2), 542–569. https://doi.org/10.33506/js.v11i2.4049
Lawton, A., & Macaulay, M. (2013). Localism in Practice: Investigating Citizen Participation and Good Governance in Local Government Standards of Conduct. Public Administration Review, 74. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12161
Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P., & Gilljam, M. (2014). When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context-Bound Relationship. Governance, 27. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12021
Lorenz, A., Anders, L. H., Müller, D., & Němec, J. (2024). Actors, Institutions and Narratives: The Neo-Institutional Framework of Analysis. In Narrating the Rule of Law: The Future of Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66332-1_2
Mansouri, N., & Quiroga-Villamarín, D. R. (2025). Ways of Seeing International Institutions. In N. Mansouri & D. R. Quiroga-Villamarín (Eds.), Ways of Seeing International Organisations: New Perspectives for International Institutional Law (pp. 57–308). Cambridge University Press.
Mendy, O., & Sarr, E. (2025). The Judiciary in Governance: Understanding the Juridical Nature and Function of the Constitutional Court of Indonesia. Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law, 2, 2025. https://doi.org/10.71239/jicl.v2i1.45
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Origins and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Nurcahya, Y. (2025). Rational-Legal Authority and Electoral Legitimacy: Reassessing Max Weber’s Theory of Power through the 2024 Election in Bandung. Jejak Digital: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(6), 4251–4258. https://doi.org/10.63822/vjxng929
Onoja, J., Hamza, O., Collins, A., Ubamadu, C., Eweje, A., Daraojimba, A., & Pub, A. (2021). Digital Transformation and Data Governance: Strategies for Regulatory Compliance and Secure AI-Driven Business Operations. Journal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary Research, 2, 43–55. https://doi.org/10.54660/IJFMR.2021.2.1.43-55
Onyeaka, H., Siyanbola, K. F., Akinsemolu, A. A., Tamasiga, P., Mbaeyi-Nwaoha, I. E., Okonkwo, C. E., Odeyemi, O. A., & Oladipo, E. K. (2024). Promoting Equity and Justice: Harnessing the Right to Food for Africa’s Food Security. Agriculture & Food Security, 13, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40066-024-00505-0
Pomeranz, E., & Stedman, R. (2020). Measuring Good Governance: Piloting an Instrument for Evaluating Good Governance Principles. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1753181
Radtke, J., & Renn, O. (2024). Participation in Energy Transitions: A Comparison of Policy Styles. Energy Research & Social Science, 118, 103743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103743
Syuib, M. (2025). Equal Access to Justice for Persons with Disabilities: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Indonesia and Australia under the CPRD. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v5i1.26855
Ul Musawir, A. (2024). Revisiting the Principal–Agent Framework in the Context of Projects: Drawing Parallels with Corporate Governance. Project Management Journal, 56(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241270572
Umasugi, M. (2025). Bureaucratic Reform and Public Policy Dynamics: Evaluation Study of One Data Indonesia Program. International Journal of Community Service (IJCS), 4, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.55299/ijcs.v4i1.1279
Utami, T. K., May, N. S., Ajijah, S. N., Al Zaidan, H., & Hendrawan, F. M. P. (2024). Analysis of the Implementation of Good Governance Principles in the Formation of Laws and Regulations in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i2.3421
Wahyudi, S., Ansar, A., Melmambessy, D., Afiyah, S., & Ariadi, W. (2024). Application of Good Governance Principles in Improving the Performance of Government Agencies: A Review of the Case of Developing Countries. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 1(2), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v1i2.31
Webber, J. (2024). Democracy-Friendly Theory of the Rule of Law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 16(2), 339–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-024-00240-5
Whitley, H. (2024). Exogenous, Endogenous, and Peripheral Actors: A Situational Analysis of Stakeholder Inclusion within Transboundary Water Governance. Sustainability, 16(9), 3647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093647
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Safaruddin Harefa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
