Revisiting Governance Theory: A Comprehensive Framework for 21st-Century Public Administration

Authors

  • Tomi Apra Santosa Akademi Teknik Adikarya
  • Anwar Manahor Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Siti Fatimah Bin Salamah Universiti Brunei Darussalam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v2i2.157

Keywords:

Public Administration, Adaptive Governance, Multi-Level Governance, Institutional Resilience

Abstract

The evolving socio-political, economic, and technological landscapes of the 21st century demand a critical reassessment of governance theory to ensure its relevance in addressing complex and dynamic challenges. This study aims to revisit classical and contemporary approaches by examining their strengths, limitations, and applicability to modern public administration. Employing an integrative literature review, the research synthesizes conceptual and empirical insights from governance paradigms including network governance, collaborative governance, and adaptive governance sourced from leading academic databases. The analysis reveals that while classical hierarchical models provide structural stability and clear authority, they are increasingly inadequate for responding to transnational issues such as climate change, pandemics, technological disruption, and global inequality. Conversely, contemporary paradigms highlight the importance of flexibility, stakeholder collaboration, and evidence-based decision-making supported by digital transformation. The findings indicate that effective governance in the 21st century requires an integrated framework that balances normative ideals of transparency, accountability, and inclusivity with practical imperatives of responsiveness, resilience, and innovation. This synthesis underscores the necessity of feedback mechanisms, organizational learning, and multi-level coordination to navigate uncertainty and create sustainable public value. The study concludes that the future of governance lies not in discarding classical theories entirely, but in reconfiguring them through a comprehensive model that harmonizes structural order with adaptability, thus equipping institutions to manage global complexities while preserving legitimacy and public trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Thani, G. (2025). Beyond Consultation: Rethinking Stakeholder Engagement in Qatar’s Public Education Policymaking. Education Sciences, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060769

Alibašić, H. (2025). Administrative Legacy of Ibn Khaldûn : A Comparative Study of Historical Influences in Contemporary Governance Practices. Institutiones Administrationis, 5(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.54201/iajas.142

Binza, P. S., Matshabaphala, M. J. D., Matshiliza, N., & Maimela, K. (2012). March 2012 Electronic copy available at : http://ssrn.com/abstract=2186347 Chief Editor and Chairperson of the Editorial Committee : Prof . M . J Mafunisa The Journal of Public Administration is accredited with the South African Department of Higher Educa. SA Journal of Public Administration, 47(1), 311–329.

Bobkier, R., Kovler, K., Tsapalov, A., & Czech, E. K. (2025). “Fusion of Horizons”: Part III. Rethinking radon Risk: Scientific advances and regulatory implications (since 1990s). Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 286(April), 107707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2025.107707

Ćorović, D., Korać, S. T., & Milinković, M. (2025). Revisiting the Contested Case of Belgrade Waterfront Transformation: From Unethical Urban Governance to Landscape Degradation. Land, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/land14050988

Elatmani, M., & El, K. (2025). The Modernization of Public Administration in Morocco through New Public Management: A Theoretical Perspective. European Journal of Business and Management, 17(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.7176/ejbm/17-2-10

Faleiros Júnior, J. L. de M. (2025). Electronic, performance and digital government: which is the better conceptual model for Public Administration in the 21st century? Brazilian Journal of Law, Technology and Innovation, 3(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.59224/bjlti.v3i1.161-183

Hergüner, B. (2024). Digital Public Administration: Revisiting Identity Crisis for the Adaptation of New Technologies. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 22(3), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.11611/yead.1367412

Hind, V. K. (2025). Justice as fairness in governance: Revisiting John Rawls in the context of public policy and administrative ethics. International Journal of Political Science and Governance, 7(5), 237–242. https://doi.org/10.33545/26646021.2025.v7.i5c.547

Jalonen, H. (2025). A complexity theory perspective on politico-administrative systems: Insights from a systematic literature review. International Public Management Journal, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2024.2333382

Komarudin, I., Duerawee, A., Prio, A., & Santoso, A. (2025). The Digital Education based on Public Innovation in Developing a Sustainable Agribusiness Ecosystem. Journal Governance Society, 2(1), 38–47.

Kumar Singh Asst Professor, S., & Kumar Singh, S. (2025). Revisiting Theories of Punishment in the 21st Century: A Critical Analysis of Retribution, Deterrence, Rehabilitation, and Restorative Justice in Contemporary Legal Systems. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(5), 136–144. www.theinfinite.in

Michaud, G. (2025). Leveraging pluralist epistemology to advance public policy studies at the university level. Public Administration and Policy, August. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-02-2024-0023

Ramaul, L., Ritala, P., Kostis, A., & Aaltonen, P. (2025). Rethinking How We Theorize AI in Organization and Management: A Problematizing Review of Rationality and Anthropomorphism. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13246

Richardson, H. S. (2004). Thinking about conflicts of desire. Practical Conflicts: New Philosophical Essays, 1990, 92–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.005

Rintia, R., Sentosa, I., & Yudithia, Y. (2025). Evaluation of the Ministry of Social Affairs Policy on Social Protection Programs in Indonesia. Journal Governance Society, 2(1), 24–37.

Romualdo, V., & Wilkins, A. (2025). Rethinking educational federalism: using assemblage theory to analyse policy travel and transformation in Argentina. Journal of Education Policy, 00(00), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2025.2537170

Rubaii, N. (2016). The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB) Education: Reimagining How We Teach What We Teach Education: Reimagining How We Teach What We Teach. https://orb.binghamton.edu/public_admin_fac/9

Runya, X., Qigui, S., & Wei, S. (2015). The third wave of public administration: the New Public Governance. Canadian Social Science, 11(7), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.3968/7354

Salazar Morales, D., Jhagroe, S., & Pineda, P. (2025). (De)colonial public administration education? A comparative study of North-South curricular differences. Teaching Public Administration, 0(0), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251364253

Syarifudin, F., Nurhasanah, H., Nurmayanti, S., Alwasi, M. J., & Al-farabi, N. U. (2025). Ibn Khaldun ’ s Thought on Leadership and Economic Governance : Relevance to Sustainable Development. 1(1), 46–60.

Testa, F., Di Minin, A., Tosi, D., Cucino, V., Ontano, G., Russo, M. V., Dahlmann, F., Banerjee, S. B., Thorpe, A. S., Figge, F., Shapira, P., Unter, K. M. M., Walls, J., Darnall, N., McCarthy, A., Ferri, P., Holland, C., & Cricchio, J. (2025). The Biodiversity Moonshot: A Spark for a Transformative Change or a New Business-Case Facade? Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.70013

Vlahos, N. (2025). Revisiting Critical Democratization: Situating Power, Place, and Participation in Capitalist Democracy. 1–16.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Santosa, T. A., Manahor, A., & Bin Salamah, S. F. (2025). Revisiting Governance Theory: A Comprehensive Framework for 21st-Century Public Administration. Journal Governance Society , 2(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/10.69812/jgs.v2i2.157