Local Government as Linkage Actors: Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v3i1.242Keywords:
Local Government, Linkage Actors, Domestic SourcesAbstract
This article examines local government as linkage actors in shaping the domestic sources of foreign policy in the United States. Although foreign policy is formally understood as the constitutional responsibility of the federal government, contemporary global challenges increasingly intersect with local governance responsibilities. Issues such as trade, foreign investment, climate change, migration, public health, infrastructure development, port governance, and transnational cooperation are experienced directly by states, cities, counties, and regional institutions. Using a qualitative descriptive approach based exclusively on secondary data, this study analyzes academic literature, policy documents, government publications, and institutional materials related to paradiplomacy, federalism, city diplomacy, subnational governance, and Foreign Policy Analysis. The findings show that local governments influence foreign policy not by replacing federal diplomatic authority, but by connecting local interests, regional development priorities, and community needs with broader national and international policy agendas. Local governments perform three major roles: institutional intermediaries that translate global issues into domestic policy responses; functional actors that participate in international arenas through economic, environmental, social, and urban networks; and policy mediators that provide implementation capacity, local knowledge, and policy feedback to federal institutions. The article argues that U.S. foreign policy should not be viewed only as a top-down process produced by national elites, but as a multi-level governance process shaped by interaction among federal, state, and local actors.
Downloads
References
Acuto, M. (2013). Global cities, governance and diplomacy: The urban link. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073810
Aldecoa, F., & Keating, M. (Eds.). (1999). Paradiplomacy in action: The foreign relations of subnational governments. Frank Cass.
Antunes, S., Guimarães, M. H., & Egan, M. (2024). Made in the USA? The paradiplomatic strategies of California and Illinois to the EU. Territory, Politics, Governance, 12(18), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2023.2218418
Barber, B. R. (2013). If mayors ruled the world: Dysfunctional nations, rising cities. Yale University Press.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Curtis, S. (2018). The foreign policy of cities. The RUSI Journal, 163(6), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2018.1562014
Duchacek, I. D. (1990). Perforated sovereignties: Toward a typology of new actors in international relations. In H. J. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units (pp. 1–33). Clarendon Press.
Eppler, A. (2024). More cooperation than conflict despite no “third level”? Subnational paradiplomacy in the European Union. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2024.2369111
Fry, E. H. (1998). The expanding role of state and local governments in U.S. foreign affairs. Council on Foreign Relations Press.
Gourevitch, P. (1978). The second image reversed: The international sources of domestic politics. International Organization, 32(4), 881–912. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830003201X
Hocking, B. (1999). Patrolling the “frontier”: Globalization, localization and the “actorness” of non-central governments. Regional & Federal Studies, 9(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597569908421071
Hudson, V. M. (2005). Foreign policy analysis: Actor-specific theory and the ground of international relations. Foreign Policy Analysis, 1(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00001.x
Karim, M. F., Mursitama, T. N., Riyadi, S. F., Affandi, R. A., & Muzdalifa, F. (2024). Informality, paradiplomacy, and cross-border cooperation: The development of tourism on Bintan Island, Indonesia. Asian Studies Review, 48(2), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2023.2259080
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1974). Transgovernmental relations and international organizations. World Politics, 27(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009925
Kincaid, J. (1990). Constituent diplomacy in federal polities and the nation-state: Conflict and co-operation. In H. J. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units (pp. 54–75). Clarendon Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2019). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Kuznetsov, A. S. (2015). Theory and practice of paradiplomacy: Subnational governments in international affairs. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315817088
Lecours, A. (2008). Political issues of paradiplomacy: Lessons from the developed world. Netherlands Institute of International Relations “Clingendael”.
Manfredi-Sánchez, J. L. (2022). The political economy of city diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 17(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-BJA10076
McMillan, S. L. (2008). Subnational foreign policy actors: How and why governors participate in U.S. foreign policy. Foreign Policy Analysis, 4(3), 227–253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2008.00068.x
Michelmann, H. J. (2009). Foreign relations in federal countries. In H. J. Michelmann (Ed.), Foreign relations in federal countries (pp. 1–10). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Morgan, D. R., & Bickers, K. N. (1992). Domestic discontent and the external use of force. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002792036001002
Nganje, F. (2016). Sub-state diplomacy and the foreign policy-development nexus in South Africa. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2016.1154889
Omiunu, O., & Nganje, F. I. (2024). Contemporary expressions of the foreign relations of subnational governments in Africa: Introduction to the special section. Regional & Federal Studies, 34(3), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2024.2361677
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027697
Reinsberg, B. (2023). The domestic politics of international cooperation. Review of International Political Economy, 30(5), 1746–1770. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2022.2069145
Rose, G. (1998). Neoclassical realism and theories of foreign policy. World Politics, 51(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100007814
Rosenau, J. N. (1969). Toward the study of national-international linkages. In J. N. Rosenau (Ed.), Linkage politics: Essays on the convergence of national and international systems (pp. 44–63). Free Press.
Schiavon, J. . (2020). Comparative paradiplomacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351012317
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton University Press.
Soldatos, P. (1990). An explanatory framework for the study of federated states as foreign-policy actors. In H. J. Michelmann & P. Soldatos (Eds.), Federalism and international relations: The role of subnational units (pp. 34–53). Clarendon Press.
Tatham, M. (2013). Paradiplomats against the state: Explaining conflict in state and substate interest representation in Brussels. Comparative Political Studies, 46(1), 63–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012453031
Tatham, M. (2016). With, without, or against the state? How European regions play the Brussels game. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198758624.001.0001
Tubilewicz, C., & Omond, N. (2021). The United States’ subnational relations with divided China: A constructivist approach to paradiplomacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166429
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Grace Natali Simbolon, Leony Agustin, Ledy Krishonni Sianturi, Mirna Wahyuni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
