The Effectiveness of South Korean Government Policies in Addressing the Low Fertility Rate Crisis: A Human Development Approach and Impact Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v3i1.238Keywords:
Low Fertility Rate, Government Policy, Human DevelopmentAbstract
South Korea’s fertility decline has become a demographic and policy challenge because it is closely connected to population aging, labour shortages, welfare sustainability, gender inequality, and weakening confidence among young adults in forming families. Using a qualitative descriptive method based solely on secondary data, this study analyzes academic literature, government policy documents, demographic statistics, OECD reports, Statistics Korea publications, and studies on family policy, childcare, housing, employment, and work–family balance. The findings show that South Korea’s low fertility rate is shaped by structural factors, including employment insecurity, unaffordable housing, high education costs, long working hours, unequal care responsibilities, and career penalties for women after childbirth. Government responses, including financial incentives, childcare subsidies, parental leave, housing support, and work–family balance policies, demonstrate increasing policy adaptability but remain limited in their long-term effectiveness. Financial support may reduce immediate household burdens, yet it cannot sufficiently transform the deeper institutional and cultural conditions that discourage marriage and childbearing. From a human development perspective, effective fertility policy must expand people’s freedom to form families under secure, equal, and supportive conditions. The study concludes that South Korea’s demographic recovery requires integrated structural reform that strengthens gender equality, accessible childcare, affordable housing, employment security, reproductive autonomy, and a family-supportive welfare system.
Downloads
References
Anderson, T., & Kohler, H.-P. (2013). Education fever and the East Asian fertility puzzle: A case study of low fertility in South Korea. Asian Population Studies, 9(2), 196–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2013.797293
Azmat, G., & González, L. (2010). Targeting fertility and female participation through the income tax. Labour Economics, 17(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.09.006
Bi, X. (2024). Research on the factors contributing to low fertility in South Korea. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 62(1), 34–38. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/62/20241675
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Choe, M. K., & Retherford, R. D. (2009). The contribution of education to South Korea’s fertility decline to “lowest-low” level. Asian Population Studies, 5(3), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730903351503
Cho, K. A. (2021). Korea’s low birth rate issue and policy directions. Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing, 27(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2021.02.16
Coleman, D. (2026). Korea on the edge: Demographic failure in a rich economy. The Japanese Political Economy, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2026.2629326
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Fluchtmann, J., van Veen, V., & Adema, W. (2023). Fertility, employment and family policy: A cross-country panel analysis (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 299). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/326844f0-en
Gauthier, A. H., & Hatzius, J. (1997). Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis. Population Studies, 51(3), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000150066
Geyer, J., Haan, P., & Wrohlich, K. (2015). The effects of family policy on maternal labor supply: Combining evidence from a structural model and a quasi-experimental approach. Labour Economics, 36, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.07.001
Halim, N. Y., Suroso, S., & Arifiana, I. Y. (2024). Connection between support social friend peers with subjective well-being in street children. International Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 1(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v1i1.43
Hwang, J. (2023). Later, fewer, none? Recent trends in cohort fertility in South Korea. Demography, 60(2), 563–582. https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-10585316
Jeong, K., Yoon, J., Cho, H. J., Kim, S., & Jang, J. (2022). The relationship between changes in the Korean fertility rate and policies to encourage fertility. BMC Public Health, 22, Article 2298. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14722-4
Jung, J. (2024). When massified higher education meets shrinking birth rates: The case of South Korea. Higher Education, 88(6), 2357–2373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01220-2
Kim, B. C. (2025). Declining fertility rates and stratified reproduction among East Asian states: Policy responses in China, Japan, and South Korea. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17516234.2025.2600310
Kim, C. Y., & Chung, S. H. (2024). Demographic transition in South Korea: Implications of falling birth rates. Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics, 67(10), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2023.01599
Kim, E., & Yi, J. S. (2024). Determinants of fertility intentions among South Koreans: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Behavioral Sciences, 14(10), Article 939. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14100939
Kim, E. H.-W. (2017). Division of domestic labour and lowest-low fertility in South Korea. Demographic Research, 37, 743–768. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.24
Klassen, T. R., & Lee, J. (2023). Policy analysis in South Korea. Policy Press.
Kwag, H., Baek, S., & Kang, M. (2024). Impact of social trust on young adults’ childbearing intention: Why does South Korea show ultra-low fertility? International Journal of Urban Sciences, 28(4), 585–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2024.2320905
Lee, D. (2018). The evolution of family policy in South Korea: From Confucian familism to neo-familism. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 12(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12137
Lee, M.-A., & Kang, J. (2023). Does having children matter? Associations between transitions in work-family role combinations and depressive symptoms among married women in Korea. SSM - Population Health, 22, Article 101383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101383
Lee, S., Duvander, A.-Z., & Zarit, S. H. (2016). How can family policies reconcile fertility and women’s employment? Comparisons between South Korea and Sweden. Asian Journal of Women’s Studies, 22(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/12259276.2016.1202027
Lee, S., & Zaidi, A. (2020). How policy configurations matter: A critical look into pro-natal policy in South Korea based on a gender and family framework. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(7/8), 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-12-2019-0260
Lee, Y. (2022). Norms about childcare, working hours, and fathers’ uptake of parental leave in South Korea. Community, Work & Family, 26(4), 466–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2022.2031889
Lim, S. (2021). Socioeconomic differentials in fertility in South Korea. Demographic Research, 44, 941–978. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.39
Lutz, W., Skirbekk, V., & Testa, M. R. (2006). The low-fertility trap hypothesis: Forces that may lead to further postponement and fewer births in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 4, 167–192. https://doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2006s167
Newman, B. M., & Newman, P. R. (2022). Theories of human development (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003014980
Nguyen, T. T. L., Pham, H. T., & Lee, J. (2024). Factors associated with future fertility intentions among Korean women of childbearing age. BMC Women’s Health, 24, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02858-1
OECD. (2024). Society at a glance 2024: OECD social indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/918d8db3-en
OECD. (2025). Korea’s unborn future: Understanding low-fertility trends. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/005ce8f7-en
Raute, A. (2019). Can financial incentives reduce the baby gap? Evidence from a reform in maternity leave benefits. Journal of Public Economics, 169, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.07.010
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Song, J. E., Ahn, J. A., Lee, S. K., & Roh, E. H. (2018). Factors related to low birth rate among married women in Korea. PLOS ONE, 13(3), Article e0194597. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194597
Statistics Korea. (2024). Birth statistics in 2023. Statistics Korea. https://kostat.go.kr
Supriyanto, T. (2024). The influence of social media on political participation in the digital era. International Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 1(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v1i1.46
Syuzairi, M. (2024). Impact of social protection policy in Indonesia post Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 1(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v1i1.10
UNFPA. (2020). Policy responses to low fertility: How effective are they? United Nations Population Fund.
Wardani, M. R. (2020). Strategi pemerintah Korea Selatan dalam mengatasi krisis demografi di era Moon Jae In [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta]. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta Repository.
Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yoo, H. (2024). The impact of low fertility rate on economic growth in South Korea [Master’s thesis, Charles University]. Charles University Digital Repository.
Yoo, S. H. (2018). Ultra-low fertility in South Korea: The role of the tempo effect. Demographic Research, 38, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.22
Yudithia, Y., Yuniartoto, W., Suryahadi, S., Soares, A., & Dewi, L. K. C. (2024). SWOT-based governance assessment of BP Batam: Addressing institutional, regulatory, and investment barriers. International Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2(1), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v2i1.100
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alya Nadzira, Abrar Arkeisha, Nursabilah Aisyah, Nasution Sartika, Mahadiansar Mahadiansar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
