Analyzing Foucault’s Theory in Digital Security Policy in the Age of AI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69812/ijsps.v2i2.156Keywords:
Foucault’s Theory, Panopticism, Biopolitics, AI, Political PowerAbstract
In the age of artificial intelligence (AI), digital security policies have evolved rapidly, intensifying concerns over surveillance, data control, and state authority. This study examines the relevance of Michel Foucault’s theoretical framework—particularly his concepts of power, biopolitics, and governmentality—in analyzing the structures and implications of contemporary digital security regimes. The widespread adoption of AI technologies in national security initiatives—such as facial recognition, predictive policing, and mass data surveillance—demonstrates a shift in mechanisms of control aligned with Foucault’s notions of disciplinary societies and panopticism. The research aims to critically assess how digital security policies operationalize power through AI, reshaping the dynamics between the state and its citizens. Using a qualitative methodology, the study applies critical discourse analysis to official policy documents, national regulations, and strategic frameworks from selected countries, supported by scholarly and media sources. Findings reveal that such policies often normalize intrusive surveillance practices under the guise of public safety and technological progress, reinforcing asymmetric power relations and challenging democratic accountability. The analysis highlights how algorithmic governance embeds power within technological systems, enabling new forms of control and oversight. Ultimately, the study concludes that applying a Foucauldian lens provides vital insights into the socio-political logics of AI-driven security. It underscores the urgency for transparent, accountable, and rights-based approaches to digital governance in an increasingly automated world.
Downloads
References
Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2015). The (Big) Data-security assemblage: Knowledge and critique. Big Data & Society, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715609066
Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2017). Politics of prediction: Security and the time/space of governmentality in the age of big data. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016667623
Bailey, P. L. (2017). The policy dispositif: Historical formation and method. In Michel Foucault and Education Policy Analysis (pp. 75–95). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315647258- 5/policy-dispositif-historical-formation-method-patrick-bailey
Baker, P., & McGlashan, M. (2020). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge handbook of English language and digital humanities (pp. 220–241).
Bax, T. (2025). Rise of the algopticon: The algoptic gaze in the age of algorithmic governance and surveillance capitalism. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02473-w
Bellanova, R. (2017). Digital, politics, and algorithms: Governing digital data through the lens of data protection. European Journal of Social Theory, 20(3), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016679167
Bigo, D. (2024). The Future Perfect of Suspicion and Prediction as a Dispositive of Security Today? The Legacy of Foucault (1977). Foucault Studies, 36(1), 73–106.
Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Practical Normativity/Normality: Investigating Practices beyond the Public Space. Open Research Europe, 3, 160.
Bozovic, V. (2024). Biopolitics and Digital Surveillance in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Broeders, D., Cristiano, F., & Weggemans, D. (2023). Too Close for Comfort: Cyber Terrorism and Information Security across National Policies and International Diplomacy. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46(12), 2426–2453. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2021.1928887
Burnashev, R. (2023). Michel Foucault’s Concept of ‘Dispositif of Security’: Central Asian Weak States. https://edizionicafoscari.it/media/pdf/books/978-88-6969-667- 1/978-88-6969-667-1-ch-10.pdf
Capodivacca, S., & Giacomini, G. (2024). Discipline and Power in the Digital Age: Critical Reflections from Foucault’s Thought. Foucault Studies, 36(1), 227–251.
De Laat, P. B. (2019). The disciplinary power of predictive algorithms: A Foucauldian perspective. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(4), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-019-09509-y
De Ruvo, G. (2025). Algorithmic Objectivity as Ideology: Toward a Critical Ethics of Digital Capitalism. Topoi, 44(1), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10117-9
Deleuze, G., & Foucault, M. (1977). Intellectuals and power. Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, 205–217.
Dennis, J. (2024). The Architectonic Eye: Reimaging Foucault, Surveillance Theory and Platform Pedagogy. JIS, 8(2).
DTLI-2023.pdf. (n.d.). Retrieved July 30, 2025, from https://cgd.ibc-institute.id/wp- content/uploads/2024/10/DTLI-2023.pdf
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
European approach to artificial intelligence | Shaping Europe’s digital future. (n.d.). Retrieved July 30, 2025, from https://digital- strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-approach-artificial-intelligence
Flick, U. (2018). Designing qualitative research.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977- 78. Springer.
Foucault, M. (2008). panopticism" from" discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 2(1), 1–12.
Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
Fraser, G. (2020). Foucault, governmentality theory and ‘neoliberal community development.’ Community Development Journal, 55(3), 437–451.
García López, P. (2024). Foucault and digital technologies of power: Studying resistance as decentralization. https://openaccess.uoc.edu/items/357ce874-e554-4723- ab09-21357e5a0556?locale=en
Happe, K. E., Johnson, J., & Levina, M. (2018). Biocitizenship: The politics of bodies, governance, and power (Vol. 19). NYU Press.
Harcourt, B. E. (2014). Digital security in the expository society: Spectacle, surveillance, and exhibition in the neoliberal age of big data. Columbia Public Law Research Paper, 14–404. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2455223
Jentzsch, S. M. (2023). Surveillance and prejudice: How is bias in digital surveillance discussed in the public discourse, in the context of select English speaking newspapers after Snowden’s leaks from 2013 to the current discussion in 2023? [B.S. thesis, University of Twente].
Kwarteng, K., & Dorries, N. (n.d.). National AI Strategy.
Manokha, I. (2018). Surveillance, panopticism, and self-discipline in the digital age. Surveillance and Society, 16(2). https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:a8f5e604- 0e3e-42d2-b373-a4e650b39dcb
Montasari, R. (2024). Cyberspace, cyberterrorism and the international security in the fourth industrial revolution: Threats, assessment and responses. Springer Nature.
National AI Strategy—HTML version. (n.d.). GOV.UK. Retrieved July 30, 2025, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-ai-strategy/national- ai-strategy-html-version
Nishnianidze, A. (2023). Surveillance in the Digital Age. ESI Preprints (European Scientific Journal, ESJ), 24, 80–80.
Prozorov, S. (2021). Foucault and the birth of psychopolitics: Towards a genealogy of crisis governance. Security Dialogue, 52(5), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010620968345
Sahakyan, H., Gevorgyan, A., & Malkjyan, A. (2025). From Disciplinary Societies to Algorithmic Control: Rethinking Foucault’s Human Subject in the Digital Age. Philosophies, 10(4), 73.
Schwinges, A., Van Der Meer, T. G. L. A., Lock, I., & Vliegenthart, R. (2024). The watchdog role in the age of Big Tech – how news media in the United States and Germany hold Big Tech corporations accountable. Information, Communication & Society, 27(6), 1073–1094. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2023.2234972
Varela, D. T. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Law through the Lens of Michel Foucault: Biopower, Surveillance, and the Reconfiguration of Legal Normativity. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(12), 189–201.
Virtual Transparency: From the Panopticon to the Expository Society and Beyond. (2018). In B. E. Harcourt, Transparency, Society and Subjectivity (pp. 369–391). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_18
Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Crime sensing with big data: The affordances and limitations of using open-source communications to estimate crime patterns. British Journal of Criminology, 57(2), 320–340.
Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hero Gefthi Firnando
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
